|
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY PLANNING, HOUSING AND DEVELOPMENT
INSPECTION SERVICES DIVISION
PLAN REVIEW SECTION
Program Mission: To ensure that building
construction documents meet adopted code requirements and support the public
health, safety and welfare is the mission of the Plan Review Section.
This section reviews
construction plans for new and altered residential and commercial
buildings. The plan reviewers are
charged with verifying the safety of all aspects of all buildings including
fire alarm and protection system; structural adequacy; sanitary plumbing; and
efficient heating and cooling systems, and electrical installations. In addition to the strict safety
requirements, the plans are reviewed for interior environmental health aspects,
and compliance with accessibility requirements, energy efficiency standards, and
elevator and escalator safety. It is imperative
that staff keep current with all code changes and do so by participating in
code development forums at the local, state and national level. The plan review staff is the code authority
in their discipline and advises field inspectors on complex code issues,
assists as field inspectors when staffing and work levels indicate the need,
and participate in Inter-Departmental programs such as Full Code Inspections,
the Green Building Program, training and educational needs for all staff.
|
Plan
Review Section
|
|
FY
2002
|
FY
2003
|
FY
2004
|
%
Change:
|
|
Actual
|
Adopted
|
Proposed
|
'03 to
'04
|
|
Personnel
|
$537,314
|
$621,211
|
$623,688
|
-
|
|
Non-Personnel
|
10,000
|
9,500
|
9,500
|
-
|
|
Total
Expenditures
|
547,314
|
630,711
|
633,188
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fees
|
547,314
|
630,711
|
633,188
|
-
|
|
Grants
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
Total
Revenues
|
$547,314
|
$630,711
|
$633,188
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
Tax Support
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Authorized
FTEs
|
8.0
|
8.0
|
8.0
|
|
|
Funded
FTEs
|
8.0
|
8.0
|
8.0
|
|
Significant
budget Highlights:
-
Division-wide revenues for FY 2002, FY 2003, and
FY 2004 have been allocated to show full cost recovery in the Plan Review and
Code Compliance Sections, with the remaining excess revenues allocated to the
Permit Processing Section.
PERFORMANCE MEASURES:
|
FY 2001
|
FY 2002
|
FY 2003
|
FY 2004
|
FY 2004
|
|
Actual
|
Actual
|
Estimate
|
Estimate
|
Target
|
|
Mission
Outcome Measures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quality rating from architects and engineers
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
80%
|
90%
|
90%
|
|
Insurance Services Office (ISO) effectiveness rating
(100% rating being the ISO goal)
|
83%
|
83%
|
83%
|
95%
|
95%
|
-
The quality rating from architects and engineers
is based on feedback on a customer survey that is provided to them on a
continuous basis.
-
The ISO effectiveness rating is given every
three years with the last one given in FY 2001 and the next one to be given in
FY 2004.
Objective: Efficiently and accurately ensure that
proposed construction complies with the Virginia Uniform Statewide Building
Code.
|
FY 2001 Actual
|
FY 2002 Actual
|
FY 2003 Estimate
|
FY 2004 Estimate
|
FY 2004 Target
|
|
Workload
Measures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plan reviews
|
9,019
|
8,773
|
15,548
|
16,000
|
16,000
|
|
Staff hours per plan review
|
4.34
|
3.83
|
4.25
|
4.25
|
4.25
|
|
Plan
reviews per plan reviewer per day
|
5
|
5
|
10
|
10
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Efficiency
Measures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number
of plan reviews over Baseline
|
20%
|
15%
|
20%
|
20%
|
20%
|
-
The percentages shown for number of plan reviews
over baseline represents the amount of review time over the baseline. The baseline is four weeks to first review
for large projects (multi-story buildings) and two weeks for small projects
(tenant work and one and two family dwellings). The current average time for the first review is one to two weeks
for single-family dwellings, three to five weeks for small buildings and large
interior alteration projects, and six to eight weeks for complex projects and
new high-rise buildings.
FUTURE BUDGET CONSIDERATIONS:
-
The increase in plan review activity over the
last six months marks the need for a new FTE within the Plan Review
Section. The FY 2003 estimate is based
on extrapolation of activity over the first four months of this fiscal
year. This is due to sharply increased
in interior alterations as well as new buildings and is expected to continue
for the foreseeable future. Currently
this workload is being absorbed by overtime hours from staff.
|