|
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY PLANNING, HOUSING AND DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT BUDGET SUMMARY
MISSION STATEMENT: The Department of Community Planning, Housing and Development
(DCPHD) is dedicated to promoting the improvement, conservation and
revitalization of Arlington's physical and social environment.
FY 2004 PRIORITIES: DCPHD's priorities are:
-
Columbia
Pike: Continue to implement the
recommendations of the Columbia Pike Initiative, including adoption of the
Form-based Code and General Land Use Plan Amendments, working with property
owners on development proposals and construction, and ongoing community
outreach and education.
-
Long-range
Master Planning: Continue efforts
to strengthen long-range planning efforts in support of the County's effort to
update the elements of the Comprehensive Plan through completion of a revised
Clarendon Sector Plan, completion of the Nauck/Four Mile Run/Shirlington Land
Use Study, implementation of revitalization strategies in the Shirlington Road
Corridor, and begin implementation of the Virginia Square Sector Plan,
including adoption of the General Land Use Plan amendments.
-
Neighborhood
Support and Housing Planning: Continue to strengthen the County's
residential and commercial neighborhoods through existing and expanded programs
including Neighborhood Conservation Plan development and project
implementation; provision of housing planning and services; implementation of
the Affordable Housing Outcome Measures; outreach to tenants and prospective
homeowners; and implementation of the Five Year Consolidated Plan and
Neighborhood Strategy Area (NSA) Plans.
-
Affordable
Housing Development: Support the
achievement of the County's annual goal of 360 committed affordable housing
units through review and analysis of affordable housing plans; evaluation of
project financing options; marketing housing programs; negotiation of developer
contributions; and administration of County and Federal financing programs.
-
Development
Process: Coordinate the development
review process to achieve improved management of residential (infill) and
by-right development, and do a thorough review and evaluation of site plan
development projects in concert with adopted County policy.
-
Code
Compliance: Ensure that inspectors
and plan reviewers are trained and certified in the International Codes;
identify the most chronic problem properties in the County and develop a
coordinated, inter-agency approach that fully utilizes available tools.
Continue to implement a coordinated inspection program, which focuses on
combining inspections with housing services to bring multi-family units with a
history of code violations up to the minimum code standards.
-
Community
Outreach: Improve outreach to the
community through continued offerings of the Neighborhood College and
associated Mentoring Program; participation in the Walking Town Meetings;
enhancement of the Department's web page and use of its Community Forum
element; gauge citizen satisfaction through surveys and other means.
-
Organizational
Development: Integrate the Housing
Development staff into the Department and create the new Housing Division.
-
Information
Technology: Continue to improve
the Department's use of technology resources; improve the Department's web
page; develop a CPHD Intranet page; integrate existing and future systems, such
as the Inspection Services Division and Planning Division's Code Enforcement
Program components of the Permits System and the Housing and Community
Development Division's Housing Data System; make better use of the Geographic
Information System (GIS) for mapping and analysis; utilize the Internet for
commission distributions, final reports, and research and "best practices"
information; use CD-ROM or other technologies for records management and
storage; and continue to explore opportunities for e-commerce activities as a
service improvement by the Department.

PRINCIPAL PROGRAMS: The principal programs
that DCPHD manages are:
Director's Office:
-
Leadership,
policy guidance, coordination
-
Personnel and payroll administration
-
Budget and financial management
-
Technology management and planning
-
Comprehensive training and organizational development
-
Legislative and other inter-departmental matters that
relate to the work of the Department
Planning Division:
-
Planning Program
- Current Planning, Including the Columbia Pike Initiative
- Master Planning
- Planning Research, Analysis and Graphics
-
Zoning Administration Program
-
Community Code Enforcement Program
Inspection Services Division:
-
Permit Processing Section
Housing and Community Development Division:
-
Community Development Block Grant (CDBG)
Office of Neighborhood Services:
-
Neighborhood Conservation Program
-
Neighborhood Strategy Area (NSA) Program
-
Historic Preservation Program
-
Commercial Revitalization Program (Multi-Departmental
Initiative)
Housing Division:
The program and budget narrative
for the FY 2004 Proposed Budget for the Community Development Block Grant
(CDBG) Program ($2,222,000, 12.0 FTEs) that is administered by this
Department, is included in Section O.
Significant
budget CHANGES: The FY 2004 General Fund proposed
budget for the Department of Community Planning, Housing and Development
(DCPHD) is $9,669,759, which reflects a two percent increase over the
FY 2003 budget of $9,437,434. The
budget reflects:
-
The increase in personnel ($202,354) is due to normal
step increases and salary and benefits adjustments.
-
The net increase in non-personnel ($29,971) includes
increases in costs for telephone charges ($1,880), vehicle maintenance charges
($25,079), and added funding in the Office of Neighborhood Services ($20,000)
for the Neighborhood College program.
There were some offsetting decreases ($16,988) including the reduction
of one-time only dollars ($10,000) in the Historic Preservation Program and a
($5,000) reduction in Housing and Community Development.
-
Revenue for FY 2004 is projected to increase eight
percent due to fee increases and an increase in permitting activity in the
Inspection Services and Planning Divisions.
The increase in grant revenue is the County's revenue (10% of grant) for
administering $1,300,000 in Federal HOME funds.
-
In FY 2003
the Housing Division (7.0 FTEs) moved from Department of Economic Development
to the Department of Community Planning Housing and Development and the
Planning Division added funding and 1.0 FTE for the Tree Initiative.
|
DEPARTMENT
FINANCIAL SUMMARY
|
|
FY 2002
|
FY 2003
|
FY 2004
|
% Change:
|
|
Actual
|
Adopted
|
Proposed
|
'03 to '04
|
|
Personnel
|
$6,970,189
|
$8,441,472
|
$8,643,826
|
2%
|
|
Non-Personnel
|
1,256,855
|
995,962
|
1,025,933
|
3%
|
|
Total Expenditures
|
8,227,044
|
9,437,434
|
9,669,759
|
2%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fees
|
4,775,312
|
3,799,095
|
4,121,504
|
8%
|
|
Grants
|
97,576
|
110,500
|
130,500
|
18%
|
|
Total Revenues
|
4,872,888
|
3,909,595
|
4,252,004
|
9%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Tax Support
|
$3,354,156
|
$5,527,839
|
$5,417,755
|
-2%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Authorized FTEs
|
119.6
|
127.1
|
127.1
|
|
|
Frozen FTEs
|
(0.5)
|
-
|
-
|
|
|
Funded FTEs
|
119.1
|
127.1
|
127.1
|
|
FUTURE BUDGET CONSIDERATIONS: The following factors may impact the DCPHD
budget in the future:
-
Decreased federal and state funding for housing, and
possible decreases in the Community Development Block Grant Program, may limit
CPHD's ability to effectively address the needs and objectives identified in
the County's Consolidated Plan, especially affordable housing and the four
Neighborhood Strategy Area Plans, and supporting associated administrative
costs.
-
An increasing community interest in undertaking
neighborhood planning and improvement efforts will strain current capacity to
provide the supportive capital improvements and services in a reasonable
timeframe. The increased demand for
major capital projects in the commercial corridors and adjacent to the aging
housing stock cannot be met with existing staff. As a result, the implementation time for projects
-
is increasing and there is less time to scope out new
projects, respond to citizen inquiries and concerns about these projects, and
ensure that projects meet citizen expectations.
-
The County's aging garden apartments, which make up a
major component of the affordable housing stock, will need increased code
enforcement, monitoring and creative strategies to achieve code compliance,
preservation and improvement while minimizing displacement of existing
residents.
-
Strategies to preserve, improve and increase the supply
of affordable rental and ownership housing to meet Affordable Housing Goals and
Outcome Measures, as well as for additional housing planning and data to
support that effort, will require additional resources.
-
A very tight housing market, reflected in a low vacancy
rate and rapidly increasing rents, increases the demands for tenant services
and exacerbates the affordable housing shortage.
-
The GIS-based system used to identify affected property
owners for notification letters, as required by the State for all land use
applications, needs to be replaced.
Software, and possibly new hardware, will be needed for this project.
-
The permits and inspections system serves multiple
County agencies, the development community and the public. The Department needs to implement system
enhancements on an ongoing basis, including e-government applications such as
web-based inspection scheduling, permit review status and posting of inspection
results. Significant new hardware
expenditures will be necessary to support these efforts.
PERFORMANCE MEASURES:
|
FY
2001
|
FY
2002
|
FY
2003
|
FY
2004
|
FY
2004
|
|
Actual
|
Actual
|
Estimate
|
Estimate
|
Target
|
|
Mission Outcome Measures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of personal computers (desktop &
laptop) replaced within industry standard life cycles (3 to 5 years)
|
100%
|
100%
|
100%
|
100%
|
100%
|
|
Percent of
total items on consent agenda
|
N/A
|
80%
|
80%
|
80%
|
80%
|
|
Percent of
recommendations agreed to by County Board
|
N/A
|
98%
|
95%
|
95%
|
100%
|
|
Number of units inspected under Full Code
Program meeting minimum code standards
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
642
|
1,285
|
|
Percent of all inspections completed within 24
hours
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
90%
|
95%
|
95%
|
|
NC capital projects
completed / percentage on schedule
|
23/65%
|
25/70%
|
30/70%
|
35/50%
|
35/70%
|
|