|
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DIVISION
ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING AND ADMINISTRATION PROGRAM
PROGRAM MISSION: To protect and enhance the
environment by providing policy direction, planning services, technical
resources and administrative and organizational support.
The Division consists of two
units, Administration and the Environmental Planning Office.
Administration ensures that the Department's direct service
providers and other staff receive the leadership, policies, tools, services and
support required to serve their customers and/or manage their programs.
Environmental Planning Office (EPO) serves as a technical resource
on environmental issues for County agencies, the County Board, and residents,
focusing on watershed management, public education and outreach, and
sustainable community programs. The
office evaluates a variety of environmental compliance issues facing the
County, including review of proposed state and federal environmental
regulations. Staff provides support for
the County's environmentally sensitive "green" development initiative and
environmentally preferable purchasing policies and also provides staff support
for the Environment and Energy Conservation Commission (E2C2) appointed by the
County Board. EPO has lead
responsibility for implementation of the County's Watershed Management Plan,
compliance with the County's Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) permit
and developing programs and policies to minimize the impacts of development on
County streams, the Potomac River and the Chesapeake Bay. The major programs within EPO's scope of
responsibility are described below.
-
MS4 Permit
Compliance. EPO manages the storm
water monitoring program required by the MS4 permit. A new five-year permit was issued by the Department of Environmental
Qualtiy in August 2002. During FY 2003,
EPO will be developing a revised stormwater monitoring plan, as required by
this permit. The revised monitoring
program will include in-stream water quality sampling, as well as dry weather
inspections of storm sewers and periodic sampling of outfall discharges during
storm events. An important outcome of
the dry weather inspections program has been the identification and repair of
sanitary sewer cross-connections or broken sewer pipes discharging sewage into
County streams.
-
Watershed Management Program Implementation
-
Watershed
Management Plan. The County Board,
as part of the Fiscal Year 2002 budget, approved the initial elements of a
multi-year implementation plan based on this watershed management planning
initiative. The principal elements
approved by the Board included an expansion of the County's street sweeping
program and funding of a storm water utility feasibility study, which will be
completed during FY 2004. The Board
also approved funding for a storm sewer inspection program and a catch basin
cleaning program to maintain the County's infrastructure and to protect water
quality. The Board also approved
funding for a public education and outreach program, including establishment of
the County's first volunteer water quality monitoring program. Part of the funding for these initiatives
came from the Source Control Fund, established under the County's Chesapeake
Bay Preservation Ordinance. During FY
2004, EPO will also provide planning and design services for approved stream
restoration projects.
-
Chesapeake Bay
Preservation Ordinance. EPO works closely with the Department of Public
Works to administer the County's Chesapeake Bay Preservation Ordinance
(CBPO). In May 2001, the County
Board adopted an amendment to the CBPO developed by EPO that substantially
increases the County's ability to protect streams and environmentally sensitive
areas. In response to new regulations
from the Chesapeake Bay Local Assistance Department (CBLAD) that became
effective in March 2002, EPO has developed amendments to the CBPO. The County Board is scheduled to consider
the proposed amendments in February 2003.
-
Four Mile Run
Environmental Improvements. In
October 2000, the U.S. Congress appropriated $1 million to Arlington
County and the City of Alexandria "for demonstration of environmental improvements
to Four Mile Run." Funding will be
used to analyze the hydrology of the watershed, evaluate the capacity of the
Four Mile Run flood control project, recommend water quality improvements,
identify riparian habitat restoration opportunities, and create a vision for
environmentally sustainable development and aesthetic improvements. Completion of the project is expected to
take 2-3 years.
-
Total Maximum
Daily Load (TMDL) implementation.
EPO has lead responsibility for working with Virginia DEQ, the Northern
Virginia Regional Commission, and neighboring jurisdictions to develop and
implement the fecal coliform bacteria TMDL implementation plan for the Four
Mile Run watershed.
-
Sustainability
Services. EPO provides ongoing
support for a variety of community sustainability initiatives. For example, staff helped prepare the Green
Building Incentive program, which grants bonus density in return for achieving
a certain building proficiency level under the Leadership in Energy and
Environmental Design (LEED) rating program established by the U.S. Green
Building Council. While this program
focuses on commercial property, EPO is also beginning work on a residential
green homes program. Work continuing
from FY 2003 includes implementation of an environmental purchasing policy
and program and continued outreach and education efforts.
-
Public
Education/Outreach. EPO plays a
lead role in increasing residents' understanding of issues affecting the
County's environment through information presented on the DES website, through
targeted advertising campaigns, and through presentations to a variety of
groups.
SIGNIFICANT BUDGET HIGHLIGHTS:
-
Sixty-five percent of all proposed budget expenditures
in this program are charged out to the Utilities Fund for work done by this
General Fund agency in support of Utilities Fund activities. This charge is reflected as an Intra-County
Charge.
-
The increase in personnel costs is due to normal step
adjustments and new hires at above entry level.
-
The decrease in non-personnel costs of $11,856 is
primarily attributable to one-time savings for stormwater monitoring.
PERFORMANCE MEASURES:
| |
FY 2001 Actual
|
FY 2002 Actual
|
FY 2003 Estimate
|
FY 2004 Estimate
|
FY 2004 Target
|
|
Mission Outcome Measures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of wet weather
monitoring events completed as required by MS4 permit (16 required in FY
2002)
|
100%
|
100%
|
100%
|
100%
|
100%
|
Number of environmental
education and outreach campaigns conducted
|
NA
|
1
|
3
|
3
|
3
|
Number of
watershed management plan projects initiated or completed
|
NA
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
Number of Board
reports submitted
|
9
|
12
|
12
|
12
|
NA
|
Percent of grams
submitted on time
|
100%
|
100%
|
100%
|
100%
|
100%
|
Objectives: To comply with all of the County's MS4
permit requirements; to ensure compliance of development projects with the
County's Chesapeake Bay Preservation Ordinance; to encourage sustainable
development practices; and, to establish an effective volunteer stream
monitoring program to increase awareness of the importance of the County's
streams and riparian areas to the health of the Potomac River and the
Chesapeake Bay.
|
FY
2001 Actual
|
FY
2002 Actual
|
FY
2003 Estimate
|
FY
2004 Estimate
|
FY
2004 Target
|
|
Workload Measures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Site plans and building
permit applications reviewed for CBPO compliance and sustainable environmental
practices
|
22
|
40
|
50
|
60
|
N/A
|
Number of volunteer
monitoring training and sampling events completed
|
N/A
|
31
|
42
|
50
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effectiveness Measures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of dry weather
inspections completed as required by MS4 permit (96 required in FY 2002)
|
100%
|
100%
|
100%
|
100%
|
100%
|
-
Volunteer monitoring training
and sampling, as well as public education and outreach, were new programs begun
in FY 2002.
FUTURE BUDGET CONSIDERATIONS:
-
There is growing federal and state regulatory emphasis
on nonpoint source pollution and urban storm water issues as a result of the
Chesapeake 2000 Agreement and the Interim Nutrient Cap Strategy currently being
developed in Virginia. As a result,
Arlington County may need to allocate additional funding and staff resources
for storm water monitoring and treatment, special stream studies, and
restoration projects in the future.
Staff will be tracking these developing regulatory issues closely in the
coming year.
|