|
SHERIFF'S OFFICE
CORRECTIONS DIVISION
PROGRAM MISSION: To provide safety and security through care and supervision to
individuals in the custody of the Sheriff.
Serving as an integral part of
public safety in Arlington, the Corrections Division is responsible for the
safety and security of individuals remanded to the Sheriff's custody. They are responsible for the basic daily
needs of those individuals and provide programs that will promote a positive
attitude and encourage behavioral change.
Inmate programs include: the Inmate Work Program, Community Work
Program, Work Release, Electronic Home Monitoring Program, the Pre-Trial
Program and educational programs.
|
Corrections
Division
|
|
FY 2002
|
FY 2003
|
FY 2004
|
% Change:
|
|
Actual
|
Adopted
|
Proposed
|
'03 to '04
|
|
Personnel
|
$12,103,455
|
$12,780,025
|
$12,985,458
|
2%
|
|
Non-Personnel
|
4,168,608
|
4,342,221
|
4,617,468
|
6%
|
|
Total Expenditures
|
16,272,063
|
17,122,246
|
17,602,926
|
3%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
9,359,085
|
7,537,796
|
7,608,661
|
1%
|
|
Net Tax Support
|
$6,912,978
|
$9,584,450
|
$9,994,265
|
4%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Authorized FTEs
|
204.0
|
204.0
|
203.0
|
|
|
Funded FTEs
|
204.0
|
204.0
|
203.0
|
|
SIGNIFICANT
BUDGET HIGHLIGHTS: The FY 2004 proposed budget for the
Corrections Division reflects:
-
Non-Personnel expenditures increased mainly due to an
increase in the inmate services contract ($263,506), water ($25,773) and
consultants ($5,516) which are partially offset by a decrease in operating
equipment ($25,000).
-
FTE decreased due to the transfer of a Deputy Sheriff II
position to the Judicial Services Division ($51,039, 1.0 FTE).
-
Revenues increased mainly due to an increase in Falls
Church prisoner reimbursement fee ($200,955), inmate processing fee ($25,000),
DNA collection fee ($15,000), weekender fee ($3,000), state salary reimbursement
($102,141) and federal prisoners (from 33 to 34) in the Arlington County
Detention Facility ($33,441) which are partially offset by state cuts in prisoner
per diem reimbursement ($282,480) and a decrease in jail services/work release
fees ($19,838).
PERFORMANCE MEASURES:
|
FY
2001
|
FY 2002
|
FY 2003
|
FY
2004
|
FY
2004
|
|
Actual
|
Actual
|
Estimate
|
Estimate
|
Target
|
|
Mission Outcome Measures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of serious incidents
|
185
|
198
|
200
|
210
|
210
|
|
Accreditations compliance rating
|
100%
|
100%
|
100%
|
100%
|
100%
|
|
Percentage of treatment plans accepted
|
96.1%
|
97.4%
|
98.0%
|
98.5%
|
98.5%
|
|
Percentage above capacity
|
109%
|
114%
|
119%
|
124%
|
124%
|
|
GEDs Awarded
|
56
|
35
|
45
|
50
|
50
|
-
New GED
test introduced in FY 2002. Preparation
for testing will improve with continued experience with using the new format.
|
Objective:
Provide safety and security of individuals remanded to the Sheriff's
custody (Security and Custody Services).
|
|
FY
2001 Actual
|
FY 2002 Actual
|
FY 2003 Estimate
|
FY
2004 Estimate
|
FY
2004 Target
|
|
Workload Measures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Police bookings processed
|
11,217
|
10,637
|
11,300
|
11,500
|
11,500
|
|
Total commitments
|
7,795
|
7,200
|
8,000
|
7,500
|
7,500
|
|
Total releases
|
7,692
|
8,308
|
7,800
|
7,750
|
7,750
|
|
Average daily population
|
560
|
592
|
620
|
650
|
650
|
|
Monthly average inmates housed in other
jurisdictions
|
49
|
57
|
55
|
75
|
75
|
|
State prisoners:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average daily housed in the detention
facility
|
50
|
131
|
150
|
175
|
175
|
|
Transported to state
|
629
|
192
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
-
Police
bookings represent the number of prisoners arrested and transported to jail, or
arrested and released on a summons that included entry into the Record
Management System (RMS).
-
Total
commitments are the number of prisoners committed to jail from arrests, warrant
service or transferred from another jurisdiction to our custody.
-
Total
releases are the number of prisoners, who were at one time committed and have
made bond, completed their sentence, transferred or released per judicial
directive.
-
Monthly
average of inmates housed in other jurisdictions includes those inmates housed
at Peumansend Creek Regional Jail (PCRJ).
Arlington County is allotted 60 beds at PCRJ.
|
Objective: Provide
programs that will promote positive behavioral change as virtually all
inmates will eventually return to the community (Inmate Programs and Service).
|
|
FY
2001 Actual
|
FY 2002 Actual
|
FY 2003 Estimate
|
FY
2004 Estimate
|
FY
2004 Target
|
|
Workload Measures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inmate risk/needs assessment
|
3,235
|
3,135
|
3,300
|
3,400
|
3,400
|
|
Inmate medical screenings
|
4,540
|
3,774
|
4,500
|
4,500
|
4,500
|
|
Inmate physical examinations
|
1,668
|
2,085
|
2,000
|
2,000
|
2,000
|
|
Inmate meals served
|
670,457
|
668,155
|
675,000
|
720,000
|
720,000
|
|
Community work program (hours scheduled)
|
9,181
|
7,391
|
8,000
|
8,000
|
8,500
|
|
Community work programs (hours worked)
|
7,365
|
4,684
|
8,000
|
8,050
|
8,100
|
|
Inmate grievanced files/heard
|
1,880
|
2,098
|
2,200
|
2,400
|
2,400
|
|
Pretrial Program:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Screenings completed
|
4,260
|
5,645
|
5,700
|
5,870
|
5,988
|
|
Attempted placements
|
820
|
825
|
840
|
873
|
891
|
|
Recommended for Program
|
429
|
377
|
385
|
385
|
393
|
|
Home detention placements
|
27
|
31
|
40
|
42
|
43
|
-
Pretrial
program screenings completed are the number of inmates who meet the eligibility
criteria and who are interviewed for placement. Attempted placements are the
number of inmates screened who appear to be good candidates and are recommended
for release to the Court. Actual placements made are the number of inmates
placed in the program by the Courts.

FUTURE BUDGET CONSIDERATIONS:
-
Facility staffing levels will need to be addressed if
the jail population continues to increase at current levels. The Arlington
County Sheriff's Office is currently seeking technical assistance from The
National Institute of Corrections to conduct a staffing analysis.
-
If local inmate population increases, then the number
of federal prisoners housed (and the resulting revenues to the County) would
decrease. The Detention Facility continues to house the maximum number of federal
prisoners without jeopardizing the safety and security of the Detention
Facility and the community.
-
Budgetary levels for building maintenance and repair,
equipment replacement and security upgrades as the Detention Center Facility
ages need to be addressed.
|