Arlington, Virginia Teens Kids Visitors Business Departments Employment Calendar News Topics Services Home

Department of Management & Finance

Fiscal Year 2004 Proposed Budget

Section C - General Government
Department of Technology Services

Proposed Budget Contents | Section C Contents | Department of Technology Services Contents | Submit Comments

DEPARTMENT OF TECHNOLOGY SERVICES
PROGRAM MANAGEMENT OFFICE

PROGRAM MISSION: To optimize the business value gained from information technology projects through the selection of the "right" projects, acceleration of their successful completion, and assessment of delivered value.

The Program Management Office oversees the application of "best practices" project management to all technology initiatives. The first step in the information technology project approval process is through this Office. The Office ensures that industry standard methodology is applied to the development and/or implementation of any project, and staff assigned to each project mentor, guide, and in many cases manage technology project initiatives. The Office identifies staff resources, develops plans, and establishes measurements to ensure that a project is completed within the agreed parameters of cost and time and that it satisfies the business objectives for the project. The Office also provides input to the CIO for his/her recommendations to the Technology Leadership Committee and the County Manager.

Program Management Office

FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 % Change:
Actual Adopted Proposed '03 to '04
Personnel $337,058 $377,242 $395,906 5%
Non-Personnel 950 25,000 25,000 -
Total Expenditures 338,008 402,242 420,906 5%
Revenues - - - -
Net Tax Support $338,008 $402,242 $420,906 5%
Authorized FTEs 4.0 4.0 4.0
Funded FTEs 4.0 4.0 4.0


SIGNIFICANT BUDGET HIGHLIGHTS:

  • Increase in personnel due to new hires at pay above entry and normal step increases ($18,664).

PERFORMANCE MEASURES:

Objective: To optimize the business value gained from information technology projects through the selection of the 'right' projects, acceleration of their successful completion, and assessment of delivered value.

FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2004
Actual Actual Estimate Estimate Target
Mission Outcome Measures
Percent of IT projects in the Proposed IT Investment Portfolio adopted for implementation N/A 76% 80% 84% 84%

Percent of monitored projects that tracked, on or ahead of, schedule and budget targets
N/A 50% 53% 55% 55%

Percent of post-implementation reviews that demonstrated that the intended business objectives were substantially met
N/A N/A 50% 53% 53%
  • In 2000, the Standish Group reported that 28% of IT projects were completed on time, within budget and with all of the features and functions originally specified.
FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2004
Actual Actual Estimate Estimate Target
Workload Measures
Number of projects identified and evaluated N/A 22 24 27 27

Number of projects directly managed
N/A 19 15 13 13

Number of projects indirectly managed
N/A 9 15 19 19

Efficiency Measures
Average staff hours spent per project N/A 160 200 187 187

Average staff hours spent per directly-managed projects
N/A 188 267 267 267

Average staff hours spent per oversight role per project
N/A 101 134 134 134

Other Outcome Measures
Number of projects integrated into e-government plan
N/A
12 20 25 25

Percent of departments with fully documented IT portfolios
N/A 4% 13% 21% 50%

Number of participants in project management training courses
N/A - 35 35 35


FUTURE BUDGET CONSIDERATIONS:

  • Additional resources will be needed to create a Portfolio of Current IT Assets and department-level IT strategies to guide future project selection and to provide for the sustainability of existing IT assets.
  • Additional resources will be needed to implement a Project Management Resource Web Site to provide easy and quick access to examples, methodologies, and guidelines County-wide.
  • Additional resources will be needed to establish a repository of web-enabled computer-based training on project management available to all County staff.
TOP OF PAGE

Proposed Budget Contents | Section C Contents | Department of Technology Services Contents