Arlington, Virginia Teens Kids Visitors Business Departments Employment Calendar News Topics Services Home

Department of Management & Finance

Fiscal Year 2004 Proposed Budget

Section C - General Government
Department of Management and Finance

Proposed Budget Contents | Section C Contents | Department of Management and Finance Contents | Submit Comments

DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT AND FINANCE
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT

PROGRAM MISSION: To ensure the prudent use of County resources.

The Financial Management component of the Department of Management and Finance consists of Administration/Tax Policy Coordination; Management and Budget; Accounting and Audit; and Purchasing and Contracts.

  • Administration/Tax Policy Division ensures that the Department of Management and Finance direct services providers receive the leadership, policies, tools, services and support required to serve their customers. This program area provides overall leadership, management and administrative support for the Department of Management and Finance, as well as for the Department of Real Estate Assessments (a division of DMF). It also includes the Senior Tax Policy Coordinator, who primarily serves as a problem solver and liaison between businesses and other agencies.
  • Management and Budget Division facilitates effective resource allocation and budget execution for the provision of services to Arlington residents. The Management and Budget Program provides financial, economic and policy analysis, research and recommendations to the County Board, County Manager, departments, agencies, and the public, and prepares the annual County operating budget and the six-year capital improvement program. This program also coordinates County bond sales, staffs the Industrial Development Authority (IDA) and the Fiscal Affairs Advisory Commission, as well as monitors County expenditures and revenues. Staff support for the Countywide Capital Improvement Program and the performance measurement system known as "Arlington Counts!" is provided by the Management and Budget Division.
  • Accounting and Audit Division provides effective controls and sound financial services. The Accounting and Audit program provides the best possible financial information to the County Board, County management, County staff, the public and other interested organizations such as bond rating agencies, and institutional investors. The program also ensures that County purchase orders and payments to vendors are processed in an accurate and timely manner and that integrity is maintained in all financial processes and in the financial information system.
  • Purchasing and Contracts Division assists agencies in the purchase of needed goods and services in a timely manner while complying with legal requirements. Purchasing and Contracts Program provides quality goods and services which meet user customer needs at reasonable costs by assuring that all purchasing actions are fair and impartial, with all qualified sellers having equal access to County business. This program provides purchasing services, consults with user agencies on bidding strategies and contract development for all County departments and agencies, and participates in regional cooperative purchasing efforts to achieve cost reductions through volume buying.

Financial Management

FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 % Change:
Actual Adopted Proposed '03 to '04
Personnel $2,187,434 $2,333,465 $2,396,909 3%
Non-Personnel 370,359 193,872 195,816 1%
Subtotal 2,557,793 2,527,337 2,592,725 3%
Intra-County Charges (52,885) (53,000) (53,000) -
Total Expenditures 2,504,908 2,474,337 2,539,725 3%
Fees 31,968 68,500 93,000 36%
Total Revenues 31,968 68,500 93,000 36%
Net Tax Support $2,472,940 $2,405,837 $2,446,725 2%
Authorized FTEs 34.0 33.0 33.0 -
Funded FTEs 34.0 33.0 33.0 -

SIGNIFICANT BUDGET HIGHLIGHTS:

  • An increase of $30,000 in fees as a result of interest received from the Industrial Development Authority which partially offsets a slight decrease in revenues received from fees charged for bid packages, from $15,000 to $10,000. The reduction is due to two process improvements that have benefited customers. The first process improvement was to raise the minimum amount for bids, and the second improvement was the posting of bid packages on the Internet which can be downloaded free of charge.

PERFORMANCE MEASURES:

Objective: Ensure that the Management and Finance Department's direct services providers receive the leadership, policies, tools, services and support required to serve their customers (Administration/Tax Policy).



FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2004
Actual Actual Estimate Estimate Target
Mission Outcome Measures
Percent of internal (DMF) personnel transactions processed satisfactorily within guidelines N/A N/A N/A 100% 100%

Percent of DMF's budget over/under appropriation
N/A N/A N/A <3% <3%

Percent of grams processed satisfactorily on time
N/A N/A N/A 100% 100%

Percent of financial transactions satisfactorily processed within established timeframes
N/A N/A N/A 100% 100%

Workload Measures
Number of personnel transactions processed N/A N/A N/A TBD TBD

Number of grams processed
N/A N/A N/A TBD TBD

Number of special projects assigned to DMF by County Board and County Manager
N/A N/A N/A TBD TBD

  • The measurements identified above are new requirements and no historical information is available. Data collection for these performance measures will commence in FY 2004.

Objective: To improve the quality of the proposed and adopted budget documents, improve satisfaction with the budget process, and improve projection accuracy (Management and Budget).


FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2004
Actual Actual Estimate Estimate Target
Mission Outcome Measures
Bond Rating: (by rating agency)
   S&P
   Moody's
   Fitch
AAA
Aaa
AAA
AAA
Aaa
AAA
AAA
Aaa
AAA
AAA
Aaa
AAA
AAA
Aaa
AAA

Percent of departments exceeding mid-year expenditure projections at year-end
N/A N/A N/A <3% <3%

Percent of departments exceeding mid-year net tax support projections at year-end
N/A N/A N/A <3% <3%

Percent of County departments meeting appropriation authority
N/A N/A N/A 97% 100%

Customer satisfaction index
N/A 73.9 75.0 76.0 80.0

GFOA Distinguished Budget Award received (yes/no)
Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

Workload Measures
Percent of departments/programs using outcome measures N/A 40% 100% 100% 100%

Bond Issuance (Millions), General Obligation Bonds, Notes sold or refinanced
$90.3 $39.5 85.6 75.0 N/A

Industrial Development Authority (IDA) Bonds issued
$7.3 $159.4 $15.0 $15.0 N/A

Other financings obtained (Millions)
$6.0 $4.5 $5.0 $5.0 N/A

Total transactions (Millions)
$103.6 $203.6 $79.6 $88.5 N/A
Number of transactions 4 7 4 4 N/A
  • Several of the measurements identified above are new requirements and no historical information is available. Data collection for these performance measures will commence in FY 2004.
  • Customer Satisfaction index is based on survey results from customers of the Management and Budget Division. An expanded Department wide survey will be conducted in FY 2004 to solicit feedback on all DMF products and services. The index is based on a 100-point scale. The target benchmark of 80 is established utilizing the American Customer Satisfaction Index through comparisons with other public and private sector organizations providing similar services.

Objective: To provide effective controls and sound financial services (Accounting and Audit).

FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2004
Actual Actual Estimate Estimate Target
Mission Outcome Measures
Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) received "unqualified" opinion from external auditors Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

CAFR received GFOA "Certificate of Achievement for Excellence"
Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

Auditor of Public Accounts Transmittal and CAFR prepared by state deadline
Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

Percent of payments processed within payment terms
N/A N/A TBD TBD TBD

Percent of audit recommendations fully implemented
N/A N/A TBD TBD TBD

Percent of procedures documented
N/A N/A TBD TBD TBD

Workload Measures
Payment vouchers processed 45,893 42,800 45,500 45,500 45,500

Efficiency measures
State Auditor of Public Accounts Transmittal of Comments received (regarding the CAFR) 3 TBD 3 3 3
  • Typically, three or fewer comments on the State Auditor of Public Accounts Transmittal of Comments are indicative of a high level of achievement and performance regarding the CAFR. This pertains to the translation of the CAFR to the Auditor of Public Accounts format.
  • Several of the measurements identified above are new requirements and no historical information is available. Data collection for these performance measures will commence in FY 2004.

Objective: To assist agencies in the purchase of needed goods and services in a timely manner while complying with legal requirement, providing the County with high quality goods/services at reasonable costs which meet customer needs in a timely manner, while using open, fair, competitive purchasing practices (Purchasing and Contracts).

FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2004  
Actual Actual Estimate Estimate Target  
Mission Outcome Measures  
Number of protests of purchasing actions upheld by a final authority (court) - - - - No protests  

Number of contracts that lapsed without timely replacement due to purchasing action or inaction
N/A N/A 4 4 4  

Number of amendments or solicitation documents issued to correct an error or omission made by purchasing staff
N/A N/A 12 12 12  


FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2004  
Actual Actual Estimate Estimate Target  

Workload Measures
 
Formal bids and contracts 423 404 405 405 405  

Informal bids and contracts
406 448 460 460 460  

Emergency procurements
83 79 80 80 80  
  • The performance of the Purchasing and Contracts Division has continued to ensure that all purchasing actions are held in compliance with all legal requirements, as evidenced by no protests of purchasing actions upheld.
  • In FY 2001, the dollar threshold for formal and informal bids was increased from $30,000 to $50,000.
TOP OF PAGE

Proposed Budget Contents | Section C Contents | Department of Management and Finance Contents