Arlington, Virginia Teens Kids Visitors Business Departments Employment Calendar News Topics Services Home

Department of Management & Finance

Fiscal Year 2004 Proposed Budget

County Manager's Message

Proposed Budget Contents


RON CARLEE
COUNTY MANAGER
ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA
OFFICE OF THE COUNTY MANAGER
#1 COURTHOUSE PLAZA
2100 CLARENDON BOULEVARD, SUITE 302
ARLINGTON, VIRGINIA 22201
(703) 228-3120 - FAX (703) 228-3295
 

February 8, 2003

Mr. Paul Ferguson, Chairman
and County Board Members
Arlington County Board
2100 Clarendon Boulevard, Suite 300
Arlington, Virginia 22201

Dear Mr. Chairman and Members of the Arlington County Board:

I am pleased to submit to you the proposed annual budget for Fiscal Year 2004. This proposed budget has been developed in an economic climate where many local and state governments -- in Virginia and across the nation -- are facing major service reductions. The federal budget is also in a deficit.

Given this economic environment, Arlington is, indeed, fortunate to consider a balanced budget that meets the following objectives:

  • Full funding of the revenue sharing agreement with Arlington County Public Schools, providing an increase of $20.1 million for a total local commitment to education of $253.3 million (a nine percent increase).
  • Fulfillment of all multi-year subject-to-appropriation contracts.
  • Full year funding for strategic options approved in FY 2003 for affordable housing, fire services, local transit, and the environment.
  • Commitment to Arlington as an Employer of Choice, with sufficient funding to maintain employee step increases, healthcare, retirement benefits, and a competitive pay plan (details to be presented in March 2003).
  • Funding for the re-opening of the Langston-Brown Recreation Center and the opening of the new Powhatan Springs skate park.
  • Investment in the County’s infrastructure through the allocation of $9.0 million in non-recurring funds for the Pay-As-You-Go Capital Program.

Current Tax Rates Maintained

This budget proposal is balanced within current tax rates and has been prepared in accordance with sound financial practices, avoiding the use of one-time funds or other quick fixes to support ongoing operations.

At a time when some jurisdictions are drawing on their rainy-day funds to balance their budgets, Arlington’s proposed budget added $1.0 million to its General Fund Reserve—consistent with the County’s policy to maintain a two percent balance. As proposed, our rainy-day fund will stand at $13.6 million.

The maintenance of current service levels and policy commitments within existing tax rates is made possible by the following factors:

  • An extremely strong real estate market. The County’s real estate values grew 15.2 percent over the past year, reflecting Arlington’s highly desirable location in the Washington area. Increases were not consistent across all sectors, however, with residential single family values surpassing commercial values at 17.3 percent versus 8.6 percent.
  • Recovery of the hospitality industry. The transient occupancy tax (hotel tax) and meals tax have recovered strongly since the closure of Reagan National Airport in the aftermath of the attack on the Pentagon. Transient occupancy taxes are expected to increase by 12.5 percent; meals taxes are expected to grow 7.2 percent. Together, these two taxes make up less than 7 percent of the County’s tax revenues.
  • Access to additional federal funding to support critical human services needs. Arlington’s historically strong commitment to human services and its unique integrated system have enabled the County to access over $5 million in federal funds through the state. This revenue source has enabled Arlington to avoid major service reductions in the human services area from recent state budget cuts and to consider meeting critical needs in the strategic initiatives outlined below.
  • Prudent decisions during the growth years of the past decade to limit both service expansion and tax reduction.
  • Maximizing revenue diversity to the extent permitted by law.

Financial Constraints

In addition to the general economic factors discussed above, several external forces have limited the ability of the County to expand services or consider tax rate reductions: state budget reductions, a dramatic increase in insurance costs and liability claims precipitated by the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, and flat growth in major tax sources.

  • State budget reductions. The state has reduced funds to local governments three times in the past year. Details regarding additional cuts will not be known until the end of the current session of the Virginia General Assembly. The proposed budget reflects a $2.8 million reduction in state funding for FY 2004. Cumulatively, the County has experienced a reduction of $5.1 million over two fiscal years. These state revenue losses have been offset by $0.7 million in federal human services grant funding, $0.5 million in other revenues, and $0.9 million in reductions in a variety of departments receiving state support through internal process re-engineering, keeping vacant positions unfilled, and reducing discretionary operating funds wherever feasible.
  • Post-9/11 impacts. Insurance costs have risen sharply for all sectors following losses from the 9/11 terrorist attacks. The proposed budget includes a total of $1.3 million for insurance costs (including Worker’s Compensation), which represents a 34 percent increase over the current fiscal year.
  • Flat Growth in Major Tax Sources. After several years of strong growth, revenues from personal property taxes are projected to decrease slightly in FY 2004. Personal property taxes, which include taxes on cars and business property, are the second largest source of tax revenue in Arlington (after real estate taxes) and make up more than 15 percent of tax revenues. Contributing to the decrease is a reduction in the value of used cars. Sales taxes are also flat, projected to grow by only 0.9 percent. An update on sales taxes in February will capture holiday sales. Sales taxes make up more than 5 percent of tax revenues.

The proposed budget is based on the best information currently available regarding revenues; however, this information is incomplete and is subject to revision over the course of budget deliberations. We will reassess revenues with particular emphasis in three specific areas: additional state funding cuts; the Business, Professional and Occupational License (BPOL) Tax; and the Personal Property Tax.

  • Additional State Funding Cuts: Final decisions emanating from the current legislative session will not be known until late March.
  • Business Professional and Occupational License (BPOL) Tax: The County’s BPOL tax revenue estimate presented in this proposed budget is conservative. Since approximately 90 percent of the BPOL revenue is collected from February through June each year, there is not enough quantifiable data at this time to support a revenue estimate change. Adjustments will be made to the revenue re-estimates at the mid-year or third-quarter reviews.
  • Personal Property Tax: This tax is also experiencing a loss of revenue growth due to a decrease in the value of cars registered in the County and the value of business tangible property.

Strategic Initiatives

The proposed budget includes recommendations for the County’s first Living Wage policy. Two phases of implementation are offered. The first phase would be to ensure that County employees receive a living wage. The cost to implement this phase is approximately $0.2 million. The details will be included as part of the compensation plan to be presented in March and would be funded from the compensation contingent.

The second phase would ensure a living wage to in-home service providers, who serve the most vulnerable of the County’s residents, enabling them to live safely within their homes and avoid institutional placements. The cost of this effort is approximately $0.7 million and is proposed for funding within the human services strategic initiative outlined below. Funding of a living wage for in-home service providers is a priority to be funded with available federal funds.

The third phase of the living wage would extend to contractors; however, due to current financial conditions, it is not recommended for Fiscal Year 2004.

Beyond the Living Wage recommendation, current revenues do not provide for new initiatives that require additional tax support. Self-funding initiatives that would further the County’s commitment to economic sustainability, transportation, human services, and neighborhood conservation are being recommended for consideration.

  • Economic Sustainability: The Economic Sustainability strategic initiative includes two components: The Rosslyn Business Improvement District, supported by the creation of a special taxing district; and the development of the Arlington Conference Center, supported by an increase in the transient occupancy tax.
  • Transportation: The Transportation strategic initiative addresses the transportation needs of Arlington’s urban environment related to pedestrian, transit and parking issues. Funding for the transportation initiative is recommended through an increase in parking meter rates.
  • Human Services: The Human Services Grant Allocation strategic initiative includes federal funding for critical human services needs. Of the available funds not previously committed, 50 percent are recommended for supportive housing initiatives (including a living wage for in-home service providers). The remaining funds are proposed for prevention and early intervention programs, language access, behavioral health services and technology.
  • Neighborhood Conservation: The Neighborhood Conservation strategic initiative proposes the addition of staffing necessary to support the increased number of projects that will be generated from the FY 2002 Neighborhood Conservation Bond, as well as to reduce the backlog of current projects.

Unfunded Priorities

While proposing a balanced FY 2004 budget that maintains current levels of service and other County financial obligations is a major accomplishment, the Board may want to consider other priority areas should additional funding become available. Details on these unfunded priorities would be provided in the event that mid-year or third-quarter estimates of revenues are more favorable. Any consideration of these priorities, however, will have to be balanced against any change in the property tax rate.

These priorities include: housing grants for homeowners; affordable housing investment; environmental health; Real Estate Assessments staffing; administrative support for the County Board, Communicable Disease Program, Emergency Communications Center, and Cultural Affairs Office; art grants, and the third phase of a living wage policy.


Arlington Counts!
Accountability and Performance Measurement

In an ongoing effort to demonstrate prudent use of County resources, we have implemented Arlington Counts!—a three-year initiative that will enhance Arlington’s performance measurement system. Phase one of Arlington Counts! was initiated this year by engaging in a rigorous review of all departmental and program mission statements to ensure that they reflect the societal and customer needs they were created to address. Departments have revisited their performance measures to ensure that they have identified outcome measures and provided results that will demonstrate the degree to which they are achieving their mission. Where historical data were not available on some of the newly-identified measures, data collection will commence in FY 2003. This first phase will enable us to ensure that we have clear alignment with resource allocation and the County Board’s priorities. Phase 2 will focus on customer responsiveness and employer of choice factors.

Conclusion

Arlington benefits from a long history of financial integrity and the highest possible reputation in the financial community. The Fiscal Year 2004 Proposed Budget seeks to continue this enviable tradition. Ultimately, the issue before the County Board and the community is one of balancing many competing interests. The extensive community debate on the proposed budget and the detailed budget reviews by the County Board will lead to a number of changes as priorities emerge. It is through this deliberative process that the County has created its financial reputation and advanced its vision of a world-class urban community.

Sincerely,


Ron Carlee
County Manager