In order to implement the vision for Columbia Pike, changes to the General Land Use Plan (GLUP) and the Zoning Ordinance, and the development of new urban design guidelines are necessary. These changes will help steer a walkable, vibrant community with a mix of office residential and retail development through revitalization and new development. It is intended that traditional urban design principles will guide this redevelopment and revitalization and reverse the trend of stand alone buildings that are built with more emphasis on the car than on the pedestrian. In addition to implementing this new vision, changes to the GLUP and Zoning Ordinance will help address the current problems relating to the lack of private investment along the corridor including small lot size, narrowness of lots, and the existing requirement of on-site parking.
Recommendation 1: Adopt the Columbia Pike Initiative - A Revitalization Plan
The purpose of this plan is to establish the overall vision for the Columbia Pike Corridor and to provide a framework to guide public and private investment for the physical revitalization of the area (see The Concept Plan). The plan also contains recommendations to help implement this vision, focusing on land use and zoning, urban design, economic development and commercial revitalization, housing, historic preservation, transportation/transit/traffic/parking and public infrastructure, and open space and recreational needs. The overall goals of the plan are to:
Recommendation 2: Conduct further study to amend the General Land Use Plan in order to help implement the new Columbia Pike vision.
General Land Use Plan (GLUP)
In order to help implement the new Columbia Pike vision, existing land use patterns on the GLUP should be reevaluated. Changes to the GLUP may include the following:
"8. These areas were designated a "Special Revitalization District": Columbia Pike on 11/15/86; Lee Highway/Cherrydale on 3/1/95. The boundaries of the Columbia Pike "Special Revitalization
District" were revised and the area was redesignated as the "Town Center Special Revitalization District." The Village Center, Neighborhood Center, and Western Gateway Center Special Revitalization Districts were designated along Columbia Pike."
"Personal and Business Services with Special Provisions for Mixed-use Development Including Residential and Office Development. Generally one to four stories with special provisions for additional height in areas designated as Special Revitalization Districts. Maximum 1.5 F.A.R. with special provisions for additional density in areas designated as Special Revitalization Districts."
Table 7 Possible General Land Use Plan Recommendations
GLUP MAP # | GENERAL LOCATION | CURRENT USE | CURRENT ZONING | CURRENT GLUP | RECOMMENDATION: CHANGE TO - |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | North/South Side of Columbia Pike west of S. Greenbriar St. | Commercial/Residential | C-1/ RA 6-15/ RA 8-18/RA 7-16 | Low Medium Residential (16-36) | Service Commercial |
2 | West side of Four Mile Run Park south of Columbia Pike | Commercial | C-1/C-2 | Low Medium Residential (16-36) | Public |
3 | South Columbus Street | Residential | R-6 | Low Residential (11-15) | Low Residential (1-10) |
4 | Columbia Pike between S. Wakefield St. and Four Mile Run | Commercial (Fronting on Columbia Pike on both north and south sides) and Residential (Barcroft Garden Apts. 31 units between S. Wakefield and S. Four Mile Run Dr.) | RA14-26/C-2 | Low Medium Residential (16-36) | Service Commercial |
5 | To rear of commercial lots fronting on Columbia Pike between Glebe Rd. and Walter Reed (adjacent to 12th St.) | 6 Resid. Units or lots along Highland St., Parking for Car Lots, Road ROW | R-5 | Low Residential (1-10) | Service Commercial |
6 | Between S. Edgewood St. and Walter Reed Dr. at 12th St. | 5 resid.. Units or Lots | R-5 | Low Residential (1-10) | Service Commercial |
7 | South west corner of Columbia Pike and George Mason Dr. | 52 Units Garden Apts. | RA8-18 | Low Medium Residential (16-36) | Service Commercial |
8 | South side of 9th Street between S. Highland St. and Glebe Rd. | 40 Resid. Units/ SFD/Duplex | R2-7 | Low Residential (11-15) | Low Medium Residential (16-36) |
9 | South side of 9th Street east of Walter Reed Dr. (section of Fillmore Gardens) | 114 Garden Apt. Units | RA14-26 | Low Medium Residential (16-36) | Service Commercial |
10 | Southeast quadrant of block bounded by Columbia Pike, S. Edgewood St., S. Cleveland St. 11th St. | 7 Resid. Units/ 3 Vacant/Open Space | R-5 | Low Medium Residential (16-36) | Service Commercial |
Recommendation 3: Conduct further study to amend the "C-2" Service Commercial District in the Zoning Ordinance in order to help implement the new Columbia Pike vision.
Zoning
Changes to the "C-2" Zoning District (to include special provisions for the Columbia Pike Corridor) may include the following:
A. Town Center Special Revitalization District
"Administrative Exception": Up to 2.0 FAR and a height up to 65 feet (with a minimum of 15 feet for ground floor retail) for mixed use if designed in accordance with Urban Design Handbook. Design requirements would address general location of buildings, heights, setbacks, transitions, ground floor retail etc.
By Site Plan: Allow up to 3.0 FAR and a height up to 105 feet for mixed use at certain locations.
"Administrative Exception": Up to 2.0 FAR and a height up to 45 feet (with a minimum of 15 feet for ground floor retail) for mixed use if designed in accordance with Urban Design Handbook. Design requirements would address general location of buildings, heights, setbacks, transitions, ground floor retail etc.
By Site Plan: Allow up to 2.5 FAR and a height up to 75 feet for mixed use at certain locations.
C. Neighborhood Center Special Revitalization District
"Administrative Exception": Up to 2.0 FAR and a height up to 45 feet (with a minimum of 15 feet for ground floor retail) for mixed use if designed in accordance with Urban Design Handbook. Design requirements would address general location of buildings, heights, setbacks, transitions, ground floor retail etc.
By Site Plan: Allow up to 2.0 FAR and a height up to 65 feet for mixed use.
D. Gateway Special Revitalization District
"Administrative Exception": Up to 2.0 FAR and a height up to 65 feet (with a minimum of 15 feet for ground floor retail) for mixed use if designed in accordance with Urban Design Handbook. Design requirements would address general location of buildings, heights, setbacks, transitions, ground floor retail etc.
By Site Plan: Allow up to 2.5 FAR and a height up to 125 feet for mixed use at certain locations.
To help understand the impacts of these possible changes with respect to density levels, Table 8 identifies the existing site area, existing commercial gross floor area, existing commercial floor-to-area ratio, potential density at 1.5 FAR, potential density at 2.0 FAR, potential density with possible plan changes, and potential density with mix of probable redevelopment sites and revitalization of existing sites.
Table 8 Existing and Potential Development
DEVELOPMENT SITE NAME | Area | Existing Commercial GFA | Existing Commercial FAR* | Potential Density @ 1.5 FAR | Potential Density @ 2.0 FAR | Potential Density with Plan Changes | Potential Density with Mix of Probable Redevelopment Sites and Revitalization of Existing Sites |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
West of S. Taylor St. | 537,296 | 146,019 | 0.27 | 771,262 | 1,029,058 | 1,029,058 | 424,957 |
Village Center | 890,904 | 61,016 | 0.07 | 1,336,356 | 1,781,808 | 1,010,665 | 816,623 |
Town Center | 3,121,570 | 1,047,961 | 0.34 | 4,682,355 | 6,243,140 | 7,229,838 | 2,987,719 |
Total | 4,549,770 | 1,254,996 | 0.27 | 6,789,973 | 9,054,006 | 9,269,561 | 4,229,299 |
Recommendation 4: Develop an Urban Design Handbook and an administrative review process (in conjunction with changes to the "C-2" Service Commercial District) to help implement the new Columbia Pike vision.
Urban Design and Review Process
The site plan opportunities would be subject to overall urban design guidelines. Design guidelines would generally address the siting of buildings, heights, setbacks, treatment of retail, parking, signage, preservation, landscaping, and streetscape. The "administrative exception" opportunities would also be subject to the overall urban design guidelines as well as specific, block by block, urban design requirements outlined in an Urban Design Handbook. The "administrative exception" alternative would permit additional density and height when a developer builds in accordance with the Handbook standards, essentially creating a second level of development permitted "by right", upon meeting the standards. If an applicant chose the "administrative exception" alternative, there would be no variation from what is required in the Handbook. The creation of this handbook would establish a form of development and would specifically address the siting of buildings, façade treatments, massing, bulk, heights, open space, and setbacks of in-fill development, larger redevelopment, and rehabilitation projects.
As part of the "administrative exception" process, a Unified Development Team would be established to evaluate projects to determine whether they meet the requirements set forth in the Zoning Ordinance and the Urban Design Handbook. The Unified Development Team would be an Interdepartmental Team comprised of various key staff from CPHD, DED, DPW, and PRCR.
The specificity of the development requirements under the "administrative exception" option would give a heightened sense of predictability to developers and could translate into a direct financial benefit. In addition, a smooth approval process is key to facilitating the opportunity for new development and can tip the balance in our favor in the competition for tenants between Arlington and our neighboring jurisdictions. Inconsistent, confusing and a drawn out approval processes delay decisions and significantly raise the cost of new development to the point that ultimately developers will look else where. Most developers are keenly aware of how long it takes to get permits and approvals from jurisdiction to jurisdiction within the metro area and this weighs heavily in their decisions to move forward or move somewhere else. Typically, a developer will weigh the cost of a prolonged approval process against other location factors.